In these Conditions:
the conditions of carriage of that sub-contractor or as provided for by statute or international convention.
assessments shall be that of the Customer and not of the Carrier.
time the receipt document is signed by the Carrier and/or his agents and/or his servants. The burden of proof in the event of dispute is with of the Customer.
The Customer shall indemnify the Carrier against:
date that delivery was scheduled to or did take place, or in the event that no delivery date was agreed and no delivery took place within one year from the date of the Carrier collected the Goods.
to Condition 15.4, no party may commence any court proceedings in relation to any dispute arising out of these Conditions until it has attempted to settle the dispute by mediation and either the mediation has terminated or the other party has failed to participate in the mediation, provided that the right to issue proceedings is not prejudiced by a delay.
These notes do not form part of the Model Conditions of Carriage 2018. They merely seek to provide guidance to contracting parties.
A contract is a legal binding agreement between the parties who enter into it. Where that contract incorporates by specific reference or notice a set of conditions of carriage, it is essential that:
Logistics UK Limited (“LUK”) has therefore prepared a Model set of Conditions (“Conditions of Carriage”) which it is hoped will form the basis for all general road haulage work within the United Kingdom and thus bring about a better understanding of the basic obligations attached to the parties who contract for the carriage of goods.
The LUK recognises the need for a set of Model Conditions of Carriage which are fair to all contracting parties and which take account of underlying responsibilities which are either prescribed by statute, reflect current practices or are agreed by the contracting parties and the Conditions of Carriage seek to achieve this.
The Conditions of Carriage do not seek to define ‘haulage charges’ which remain a matter for commercial agreement between the parties.
To be enforceable the Conditions of Carriage must be brought to the attention of, and agreed by, both parties before the contract is entered into.
Normally they will be introduced on the initiative of the Carrier and it will be the Carrier’s responsibility to bring them to the attention of the Customer, preferably at the time of quoting for the work and certainly before any final agreement is reached between the parties.
This can conveniently be done by including on the front of the Carrier’s stationery a statement that “all contracts are subject to the Model Conditions of Carriage 2018 issued by Logistics UK. These Conditions of Carriage are either printed upon the reverse of this document or are available upon request. Customers should satisfy themselves that the terms of these Conditions of Carriage are acceptable to them”. Acceptance of any quotation by the Customer will then imply acceptance of the Conditions of Carriage. It is important to note that courts take the view that it is for a party who seeks to rely upon exclusion and limitation clauses to demonstrate that the relevant Conditions were bought to the attention of the Customer and that the exclusion and limitation clauses are valid and relevant.
The Conditions of Carriage are a template and those using them should modify them to meet their particular requirements.
In the event you seek to modify the Conditions of Carriage we recommend that you take legal advice in relation to the changes you make. If a Carrier chooses to modify these Conditions of Carriage in any way then any reference to the Conditions of Carriage should clearly state that they are “as amended” and this should be incorporated in any statement making reference to the Conditions of Carriage.
Since the Conditions of Carriage are Model Conditions it is open to the parties to amend them in any way that is appropriate to the contractual relationship. It should be borne in mind, however, that such amendments should be legally sound, must be agreed by the parties to the contract and it is recommended that the changes should be communicated to and accepted by any insurer involved in covering the risks arising from the use of the Conditions of Carriage. Care should also be taken to ensure that any amendment is compatible with the remaining Conditions in the Conditions of Carriage.
In 1995 LUK and the Road Haulage Association (“RHA”) agreed a consignor-carrier-consignee accord (“Accord”). This sets out good practice in relationships between carriers and their customers and is compatible with LUK’s 2018 Conditions of Carriage.
The terms of the Accord are reproduced as an appendix to these notes and further copies of the Accord are available from either organisation.
Defined terms in these guidance notes shall have the meaning set out in the Conditions of Carriage, unless expressly defined in these guidance notes.
In drafting the Conditions of Carriage, LUK has borne in mind that either the Consignor or the Consignee could be one of the parties to the contract in addition to the Carrier. For this reason both Consignor and Consignee have been defined in a way which allows either to be the Customer of the Carrier. This has been done with a view to addressing a difficulty experienced in certain Conditions in current use which have been drafted on the assumption that the Consignor is always the Customer although because ownership of the goods may have changed the common law position might normally assume the Consignee to be the Customer.
A Carrier is permitted to sub-contract unless the Customer specifically states in writing that sub-contracting is not permitted, the Carrier may sub-contract part or the whole of the carriage except in the case of Dangerous Goods.
The Carrier has the freedom to choose the sub-contractor, however he should be prudent in making that choice.
If a Customer insists before the contract is entered into that the carriage should not be sub-contracted then it is advisable that special arrangements should be made to cover emergency situations. For example if a vehicle carrying the Goods breaks down or is involved in an accident, as a Carrier may not always be able to provide its own replacement vehicle.
In the case of the carriage of Dangerous Goods the carriage cannot be sub-contracted unless the Customer has agreed in writing before the sub-contracting takes place. Therefore, the Carrier should never sub-contract the carriage of Dangerous Goods without the written consent of the Customer. Consent by the Customer may be given after the contract has been entered into but care should be taken to ensure that the agreement of the Customer has been obtained in writing.
Generally the Carrier will be liable (up to the limits of liability) set out in Conditions 9 and 10 for any loss, damage or delay caused by a sub-contractor but where carriage has been sub- contracted to an air, sea or rail Carrier often the Carrier’s liability is defined by statute or convention. The Conditions make it clear that the Carrier’s liability for Goods which are lost, damaged or delayed whilst in the hands of such a sub-contractor will not be greater than that provided for in the statute or convention or the Conditions of Carriage of that sub-contractor.
It sometimes occurs that a sub-contractor’s limits of liability may be greater than the Carrier’s limits, however the Conditions make it clear that the sub-contractor’s liability to the Customer. Should the Customer seek to claim against the sub-contractor directly, the sub-contractor’s liability will not be greater than the liability of the Carrier by virtue of Condition 2.5. This clause is believed to be effective by virtue of the indemnity given by the Customer in Condition 11.3.
There would, however, need to be a similar indemnity given by the main contractor (the Carrier) to the sub-contractor in the contract entered into between them. The effect of Condition 2.5, and the indemnity in Condition 11.3 and in the agreement between the main contractor and the sub-contractor is that the sub-contractor is relieved of all claims made against him as bailee of the Goods which are beyond the limits set out in Conditions 9 and 10.
It is suggested that the Carrier should make it clear in any sub-contract that the sub-contractor is not in turn entitled to further sub-contract the carriage as there is a risk that protection given by the limits and exclusions of liability contained in these Conditions will be lost to the Carrier.
The purpose of this Condition is to define the responsibilities as between the Carrier and the Customer relating to the provision of plant, facilities and labour for loading and unloading. Not only is this a common area of misunderstanding but the health and safety executives are known to be concerned as to whether proper risk assessments have been carried out at collection and delivery addresses and unless the responsibilities are clearly defined it may be held that such responsibilities rest upon the Carrier. As such Condition 3.5 makes it clear that the responsibility for carrying out risk assessments shall lie with the Customer.
As the Customer may be either the Consignor or Consignee Condition 3.2 places a responsibility upon the Customer to make sure that proper arrangements have been made for loading and unloading at the respective addresses.
When loss, damage or injury is caused during loading or unloading as a result of defective equipment other than the Carrier’s equipment or by the Carrier acting on the instructions or actions of the Customer or where loss or damage is caused by negligent acts of the Customer or its servants or agents, then the Customer is bound to indemnify the Carrier against any claim made.
The potential risks and liabilities associated with the carriage of Dangerous Goods is great and this Condition imposes upon the Customer the duty to provide full information and comply with all appropriate regulations.
Carriers should ensure that they have received from Customers all of the information set out in Condition 4.1 and any other information which they consider necessary before they agree to carry the Dangerous Goods, particularly with reference to labelling and packaging. This is vital if the Carrier and the Customer are to comply with all statutory requirements applying to the Dangerous Goods being carried and to afford the Carrier protection should, due to incorrect or inadequate labelling, inappropriate goods be mixed upon the vehicle.
The Customer shall also indemnify the Carrier for any losses it suffers as a result of non-compliance by the Customer with the obligations set out in Conditions 4.1 and 4.2.
As a matter of good practice Condition 5 requires that a receipt or Consignment note acknowledging acceptance of the Goods being carried should be signed by the Carrier as requested and if requested he should obtain a signed receipt for delivery of the consignment from the Consignee. The absence of such documents can complicate the resolution of any disputes. However, the absence of any such document would not negate the application of the Conditions of Carriage generally.
Modern computerised systems and techniques installed by Consignees or Consignors have in many cases made the traditional signature on the document provided by the Carrier inappropriate. Many companies issue computer printed receipt notes representing quantity and description of Goods received and require these to be submitted by the company with its invoice for the goods. Failing to produce such a document can often result in disputes arising between the Customer and the Carrier regarding payment for the Goods delivered. However, unless expressly agreed to be part of the system the absence of such a document does not prevent the Carrier from claiming payment for the carriage. Frequently the attention of delivery drivers is not drawn to the importance of obtaining such documents before leaving a consignee’s premises. Carriers would be well advised to ensure that their drivers are properly instructed in the documentary requirements.
Due to human error, mistakes can occur in the preparation of such documentation and for this reason the Condition makes it clear that such documents are not conclusive proof of either the description of the Goods or of their Condition.
Except where it has been agreed before the Contract is entered into that the Goods will be carried at the Owner’s Risk, the Conditions of Carriage have been drafted on the basis that the Carrier will, subject to Conditions 9 and 10 and to the specific responsibilities placed upon the Customer as set out in Conditions 11 and 12 be responsible for loss, damage or delay to the Goods whilst they are in its care. The period during which the Carrier has responsibility for the Goods has been clearly defined in Conditions 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4.
Where it has been agreed that the carriage of Goods is at the Owner’s Risk. The Customer will indemnify the Carrier for any claims made by a third party which arise whilst the Goods are at the Owner’s Risk.
With the advent of 24 hour, 7 days a week carriage, Carriers should agree with the Customer the hours which they both consider constitute normal business hours at the delivery address. Condition 6.5 addresses variations to the Contract and that mutual agreement (which shall not unreasonably be withheld or delayed) is required before a variation can be made.
Condition 7.1 makes it clear that although a Carrier may agree to try and recover its carried forward charges, this will not relieve the Customer from responsibility for payment should the Consignee fail to do so.
In relation to payment terms these are to be agreed between the parties. Where the parties do not agree payment terms the default position is 30 days from the date of the invoice.
Where payment of any invoice is not received within the payment period, the Carrier shall be entitled to charge interest up to 8 per cent above the base rate of the Bank of England.
This Condition makes it clear that in the event of any claim or dispute relating to the carriage arising between the Carrier and the Customer, the Customer remains responsible for paying the charges and the charges cannot be withheld on the basis of a set off, either as a result of a claim or against any charges which may be due from the Carrier to the Customer. This seeks to prevent the Customer from prejudging the issue in dispute and unreasonably penalising the Carrier.
This Condition explains how the Carrier can dispose of Goods in certain circumstances, however the Carrier must act fairly towards the Customer and the Condition sets out the steps which are required to ensure that reasonable efforts are made to notify the Customer of any difficulties and of the eventual intention to sell the Goods.
The Condition makes it clear that the Carrier is under no duty to obtain any price for the Goods beyond market value at the time and enables the Carrier to dispose of the goods if he can establish that they have no market value.
The Condition also deals with the difficult situation which may arise where the Carrier is unable to effect delivery of Dangerous Goods which cannot be readily disposed of by sale.
As explained under Condition 6 the Conditions have been drafted upon the basis that the Carrier will be liable for loss, damage or delay or unless liability is excluded by any of the specific examples as set out in the Conditions. Under the following Condition 10, however, that liability is limited and the limitation of liability is set out in that Condition.
In the absence of any agreement in writing to the contrary at the time that the Contract is entered into, the Carrier’s liability is limited to £1,300 per tonne inclusive of all duties and taxes calculated by reference to the gross weight of the Consignment or £500 for the entire Consignment, whichever is the greater, not exceeding the actual value of the Consignment.
The value of the Goods includes all duties and taxes which may be attracted by the Goods.
It is anticipated that in most cases where there is a ready market for the Goods then the evidence of the valuation of the Goods will be provided by the commercial invoice. Where there is no such sale it is anticipated that the valuation will be determined by reference to the market value of the Goods.
In the event of delay and any losses other than the loss in value of the Goods, the Carrier’s liability shall not be greater than the carriage charges unless any greater liability has been agreed in writing between the parties before the Contract is entered into.
The Carrier’s responsibility can be insured under a special policy drawn up for the purpose by their insurer.
The Customer can himself insure the Goods for sums greater than the Carrier’s liability but that is a matter for the Customer to decide. Should, however, the Carrier agree with the Customer that he will accept a liability greater than those set out in the Conditions, the Carrier should ensure that his insurance company is aware of the levels of risk which he has accepted and this is particularly important if he agrees an increase in liability in respect of delay or consequential loss, for these items are frequently excluded from many goods-in-transit insurance policies.
These Conditions no longer make it a term of the Contract that the Carrier should insure his liabilities under the Contract, however carriers are strongly recommended to insure their liability and keep the insurance company aware of any change in the contracts that they enter into.
Just as a Carrier accepts responsibilities under the Contract so the Customer must accept responsibility for its own action and this Condition provides that the Customer will indemnify the Carrier against any losses which the Carrier suffers as a result of the Customer’s actions or where the Carrier receives claims from third parties which although primarily the responsibility of the Carrier should be the subject of an indemnity or contribution from the Customer.
Condition 11.5 is particularly important for frequently the Customer will not be the owner of the Goods and the warranties made by the company that he has the authority of the owner of the goods to enter into the Contract is very important.
These Conditions set out the requirement and the time limit for notification of claims and these should be considered carefully when deciding whether the claim should be dealt with as a claim for delay in delivery or whether the Goods should be deemed to have been lost. Please also be aware of the time limits set out in Condition 12.3.
This Condition gives to the Carrier a lien, that is a right to withhold the Customer’s property, against the Goods for all monies due from the Customer to the Carrier not only in respect of the charges for the carriage of the actual Goods in question but also any other charges which may be due and outstanding to the Carrier or which may arise during the course of the carriage. This lien is wider than the common law lien, which permits Goods only to be held in respect of the carriage charges due in respect of those particular Goods. In practice the common law lien is of limited value to the Carrier and hence a contractual lien is granted under these Conditions. A lien can only be exercised, however, against the actual owner of the Goods and this is why it is important that the Customer gives the warranty that he has the authority of the owner of the Goods to enter into the contract.
This Condition enables the Carrier to claim against the Customer for any delay in release of the Carrier’s equipment whether it is a vehicle, trailer, pallet or storage of equipment generally described as “demurrage”. It is recommended that the Carrier should agree with the Customer in advance what they consider to be excessive periods of delay and the rates that will be charged for the individual items of equipment should that delay occur.
Dispute taken through the courts can prove costly to both parties and this is recognised by the encouragement given to use Alternative Dispute Resolution proceedings when disputes arise. This Condition sets out steps, which should be taken, rather than embarking upon costly court proceedings.
This Condition sets out the confidentiality obligations on each party and the restriction that each party shall not disclose confidential information of the other party unless an exception applies.
It is for the Carrier and the Customer to agree on the legal regime, which shall be used for construing and interpreting the Contract and these Conditions and also the country that has jurisdiction for hearing any legal proceedings. Thus a Carrier based in Scotland using the Conditions may choose to modify them so that the law of Scotland applies and the courts in Scotland can deal with any dispute.
Where no specific agreement has been reached, this Condition provides that English law shall apply and the English courts will have jurisdiction. Carriers should be aware that the law may be different in Scotland and in Northern Ireland, although it is believed that there are no significant differences of interpretation affecting these Conditions of Carriage.
These Conditions do permit the parties to vary the Conditions. However, it is important that where the Conditions are varied, the variations should be evidenced in writing and signed by the parties. It is suggested that those variations should be attached to the Contract as a separate schedule. Matters that might be covered are:
The Conditions and this guidance note are the copyright of LUK. However, LUK grants a licence to both members and non-members of LUK to use and copy these Conditions of Carriage and guidance notes provided that acknowledgement of LUK’s copyright is noted upon the Conditions used and any guidance notes used.
LUK/RHA Consignor/Carrier/ Consignee Accord
One of the characteristics of the transport industry is the vast amount of legislative controls placed upon it. Whilst such issues are legally the responsibility of the Carrier, both Consignor and Consignees also have a responsibility to ensure that all of the legal requirements placed upon the parties to the Contract (and any sub-contractors that are hired) are met to ensure a successful conclusion. The Accord gives guidance on areas where conflict with the law is possible, and where all parties to the Contract can help to ensure that the Carrier meets all of its legal requirements.
After a Contract has been concluded, it is in the best interests of all parties to that Contract to ensure that it is completed successfully. However, whilst companies will often devote substantial resources to developing the original Contract, they often fail to spend equivalent amounts of time considering the likely problems that may be encountered in physically executing it, causing problems to develop later. Such problems are often particularly acute in the distribution sector due to the widespread use of third parties by the Consignor who are not privy to the original Contract and who have little opportunity to discuss their needs with the Consignee. As such, representatives from the UK’s leading trade associations representing all parts of the distribution chain (Logistics UK and the Road Haulage Association) have developed this Accord which outlines both parties’ responsibilities to each other.
The overriding business imperative is compliance with the law; in this respect the Carrier is required to:
Whilst such issues are legally the responsibility of the Carrier, it is clearly in the best interests of both Carrier and Consignor to work together to ensure that all legal requirements are met.
It is in the interests of all parties to ensure that a Contract is successfully concluded. Discussions between the parties regarding their responsibilities to each other are essential if difficulties which could raise costs and, at worse, break the law are to be avoided.
A good working partnership requires that:
However, there are also a number of commercial and practical considerations that parties to a Contract must discuss with each other to again ensure a successful and profitable outcome. All too often, once the Contract has been agreed, the parties to it end their dialogue with each other until problems occur, by which time it may be too late to avoid losses. Other companies may also be brought into the operation yet have little opportunity to discuss their own operating circumstances and needs with their partners in the Contract. This lack of dialogue sees inefficiencies developing in the chain that could be easily overcome, were all the parties to recognise their responsibilities to each other and each others’ problems. The Accord identifies areas where problems could develop, so that all parties concerned can make themselves aware of potential problem areas for their business partners.
The Accord has been developed to address these problems. Incorporation of the Accord’s ideals will help to ensure that problems and difficulties do not occur. Only by working together and taking a partnership approach can all of those involved realise the full potential of the Contract. Both LUK and RHA commend the Accord to all sectors of industry, believing that its incorporation will bring about numerous benefits to all who have an interest in developing more efficient distribution networks.
This Accord was reached following discussion between LUK and RHA members and was subsequently approved by all the key policy bodies of both organisations. As such it is commended as a framework for creating more efficient, legally compliant and environmentally beneficial arrangements between Consignors, Carriers and Consignees of freight whether or not they are members of these association.
In the Conditions:
or delivery shall be carried out by the Company only under its Conditions of Carriage and not subject to these conditions.
Where the Company has agreed to deliver the Goods such delivery shall be undertaken subject to the Company’s Conditions of Carriage.